l o o k i n g   c l o s e r

lclogo1.jpg (14001 bytes)

  <  back

respond to the review


A talk with the stars of
The Lord of the Rings:
The Return of the King


Elijah Wood

 

by Jeffrey Overstreet

Copyright © 2003 by Jeffrey Overstreet. Reproduction is forbidden without permission of the author.
Contact Jeffrey Overstreet at joverstreet@gmail.com.
 


A ROUNDTABLE INTERVIEW WITH THE CAST AND CREW OF THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RETURN OF THE KING

On Wednesday, Dec. 5th, Jeffrey Overstreet joined several other privileged film critics, including Steven D. Greydanus (Decent Films), Andrew Coffin (World), Steve Beard (Thunderstruck), Jeremy Landes (Christian Spotlight), and Michael Elliott (Movie Parables) to talk with members of the cast and crew for the year's most ambitious, exhausting, and gloriously realized film. Over the course of this week, Looking Closer will be adding excerpts of those interviews here. Keep checking back!


Elijah Wood - Frodo

WARNING: THE FOLLOWING INTERVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS. DO NOT READ IT IF YOU WANT TO GUARD YOUR IGNORANCE ABOUT PLOT POINTS IN THE FILM.
 

Jeffrey:
Do the movies look different to you three years later? Are you seeing things in them you didn’t see early on?
 

Wood:
It doesn’t feel like there is that much distance between working on the movies and the movies coming out, because every year we’ve gone back to do pickups. Every year that we come and talk about these films and every year that we see these movies it feels pretty recent in our history. I think if I were to go back now and watch Fellowship and watch Two Towers, I think I might have a slightly different review on them and see them from a slightly more open perspective, but I think pretty objective about them anyway just because there is so much of these films that a) we don’t know what it’s finally going to look like when we see it, and b) certainly for films 2 and 3, the stories are so separated that there’s a good two-thirds of each film that I had no concept of what was happening to the other characters because I was so focused on my own journeys. For the first time I saw Two Towers and the first time I saw Return of the King it was sort of like watching a movie that you weren’t a part of because there is so much new coming at you. 

Jeffrey:
You spent so much time in Tolkien’s world and seeing through his eyes, has his view of the world, his views on spirituality, his views on right and wrong influenced your own thinking? Do you find his view of the world appealing or
discomforting?

Wood:
I certainly agree with him. I think in playing a hobbit, I was at the very center of his ideology, his perspective of what was good and what was wrong with the world. He wrote hobbits and certainly the Shire as all that is good and pure in the world. I sort of agree with his perspective on the fact that there all these wonderfully good and pure things that are being threatened by Mordor which is in my estimation the modern world threatening all that is good and pure.

Those themes that are very important in the story to Tolkien became very important to me. I think I agreed with them before, but especially after working in New Zealand.  I think those things resonated even clearer. Working in a country that is so lightly populated and is so pure in terms of its ecosystem and its nature. There are bits of New Zealand where there are no people at all, and it is just sheep and landscape. I think we all learned—if we hadn’t already—I think we all had a relatively good perspective of the earth and the fact that it’s being threatened. But after living in New Zealand and working in New Zealand I think we all have a better perspective of the state of the world and that it needs to be saved and preserved.

Steven D. Greydanus:
You play a hero in this film who sacrifices all that he has in him but ultimately fails. He succumbs to the addiction of the Ring. And he is saved from the fate of Gollum and Isildur by chance or fate or providence or whatever you want to call it…

Wood:
It’s mercy. It’s in the book: It’s Frodo’s mercy for Gollum that destroys the ring. Had Frodo killed Gollum, he would have possibly gotten to Mount Doom and he would have kept the ring for himself and the world would have been doomed. [It was because] he saw a kinship in Gollum and had an understanding and an empathy with Gollum that Gollum stayed alive and ultimately impeded upon Frodo’s own destruction, which destroys the ring.

SDG:
There is also the theme running all the way to the first film where Gandalf says to Frodo, “There is another will at work… in the finding of the Ring, that it came to your uncle that you were meant to have it … and that is an encouraging thought.” Given the way that the ring was represented almost as an addiction, and that is certainly how Andy Serkis played him… as an addict… I wonder if you have any thoughts about the Ring as a metaphor for addiction, particularly in regards to the common idea among addicts of a need to acknowledge a higher power to overcome the addiction. Is faith in a higher power necessary for overcoming addiction?

Wood:
Whoah! That was well done, by the way! I’m very proud of myself for being able to hold that all in!

I certainly give credence to that in life. I’m not sure it pertains to Frodo’s particular journey. The way that Frodo gets through is ultimately in his will and his courage and his own inner strength and belief that gets him through. It’s also Sam as well, belief in Sam, his love of Sam. It’s the love in his heart and the good in his heart that holds the evil at bay for as long as it does. I don’t think there is anything else that he looks to to free him of this addiction.

Jeremy Landes:
What about calling on the name of Elbereth?

Wood:
Well, yeah… calling on the light of Earendil. But I don’t know that there is any higher power that he believes in to help him get through. I think it really is about, if anything, Sam.

Press:
Frodo is unable to go back to the Shire. But Sam carried [the ring] for a while and he was able to go back and live his life…

Wood:
Sam did for a brief moment carry the Ring, but he didn’t carry the Ring. It is that experience of having been burdened by that evil for that period of time that has permanently etched away at Frodo’s soul. That is something that he can never get back. There is something sacrificed in the destruction of that ring, a piece of Frodo. It is almost like a loss of innocence. He’s gone back home war-torn, like someone who has seen the atrocities of war and then come home and their home doesn’t look the same to them anymore and they can’t find the same pleasures that they used to because they’ve experienced something so horrid. Although Sam was there with Frodo and certainly experienced his fair share of the atrocities of the journey, he doesn’t know that, what that Ring did to Frodo. He never experienced the true weight and the profundity of that.

Press:
I noticed the marks on your neck as you got closer to Mount Doom, almost like a stigmata…

Wood:
It’s because the Ring gets heavier, and keeps getting heavier and starts to tear at Frodo’s neck. With Sam being able to go home at the end, he never lost a bit of his soul. He never lost what makes him Sam. He never lost his purity. Frodo did.

Jeremy Landes:
Do you have a “Sam” in your life that helps keep you centered and accepts you unconditionally.

Wood:
I’ve got a few people in my life that keep me centered. All of my friends … and my family. In a lot of ways, Sean is Sam to me. We may not see each other every day and I may live in a different state now. But there is a real truth to the relationship that we had in comparison to Frodo and Sam. Not as intense as that, but we became brothers. We love each other very much despite differences.

Jeffrey:
What about role models? You have a lot of acting ahead of you, we hope. You’ll be recognized as Frodo everywhere you go, I’m sure. Is there any actor who has gone before and been through similar levels and success and familiarity who you would like to follow their career arc for yourself?

Wood:
I really admire Johnny Depp’s career. It’s never been about celebrity or fame. He’s definitely had a certain amount of fame, but he does what he wants to do, and he tends to only work on projects that he’s really passionate about, which has always been my philosophy. He’s done that really well. It doesn’t matter how big or small the project is. It’s always just about the role and the quality of the project. He leads a very good example in Hollywood today for the right way to go about one’s career. There are a few actors that I think embody the same [thing], that never really let me down … I think they always choose things that they really believe in and only do it for the work and have their private lives. He’s also brilliantly mixed his own life privately with the work that he does. You never really see stories about him, these days anyway. You don’t see him in the public eye too often. He works very hard at keeping his private life separate. I think he’s a good inspiration.

I’m also really inspired by Viggo, in terms of personally someone I know, his work ethic. On the set, he was a constant inspiration to all of us. The man gave 110 percent every single day. He’s also such a giving individual and a kind-hearted man, and a brilliantly talented actor, painter, photographer…

Steve Beard:
At the end of the filming process, did you feel in leaving New Zealand––
 

Wood:
Did I feel like I was leaving for the Gray Havens? 

Steve Beard:
Yes! Was there any kind of a similarity?

Andrew Coffin:
And can I add to that … what will you take with you [now that the project is over]?

Wood:
We’ve wrapped like five or six times! [laughs]

But I’ll speak of two of them because two of them are very significant.

The first time we finished the films [laughs again], we wrapped up principal photography. At that point we did not know that we would be coming back for pick-up shots. As far as we knew, the films were over. I don’t know that when I left I felt like Frodo felt because I think Frodo felt… shed of all that burden and he is at peace. And to me, there was a real sense of mixed emotions. I was leaving my family and people I’d become really close to, and a country that I loved, and a way of life that I’d gotten so used to. And I didn’t know what my life meant anymore at home, in my own daily life. So it was difficult. Great in that I could finally get home and relax and feel that peace, but that peace didn’t come without its consequence.

Then we wrapped again on the pick-ups of the third film, which is another significant thing for us because it was literally the last time we were in New Zealand for filming ever. That was really hard. In some ways that was more emotional because we’d already gone through the difficulty of wrapping the first time and then we got lulled into this sense of security that we’d have to come back every year. And that was great! We got so used to saying, “See you next year!”

And then suddenly, we were on the brink of the end, and I didn’t know what to do. I got there and it was this reunion and it felt like I never left and suddenly I saw actors leaving. Each actor was given their own farewell. I would go to each of them. I would watch them and all of them would cry and the whole crew would be present. And I thought, ‘I don’t want this to happen to me. I don’t want to have to go through this. I don’t want to go through the process of having to say goodbye to everyone in this way. As beautiful as it is, it breaks my heart and I don’t know if I’m ready for it.’ It came time to do it and I had to make a speech in front of the crew and I couldn’t articulate what I wanted to say, I was so overwhelmed with emotion. Leaving that was very emotional and very sad and moreover difficult to comprehend, as much as it was sinking in, I couldn’t get my head around  it. And now we’re at the brink of the end again as we say goodbye to these movies in terms of their release.

Throughout all of these years and various ends and saying goodbye that we’ve done, the thing that rings true, and now I’ll come around to your question, brilliantly! [laughter all around] is that the thing to take with us at the end of all this is the friendships made. It is the thing that will endure for years and years when these movies are in the film history books. The Fellowship will carry on. There’s something really hopeful and beautiful about that. We can certainly rely on that. It is the thing that I personally am most proud [of] and feel most blessed to be able to take away from the last four years—that sense of family and closeness with the actors and the crew. I’ve never felt anything like that.

Andrew Coffin:
Did that have to do with the intensity of the process or from the story itself?
 

Wood:
Both, in a way! The story called us to have these relationships for the characters, but the two months we had before the filming really secured the friendships, and then the process of making these movies… we were there for sixteen months, and spent all of our time together, and consequently all of our free time as well. 

Press:
The majority of this group would call this the greatest trilogy ever made. Do you have any sense of “How will I surpass this?”

Wood:
I don’t really want to surpass it. It was its own experience. I would hate to surpass it, to try to do something better than that. I think that means I wouldn’t have appreciated it enough. It will endure in my mind and my heart for the rest of my life.

Jeremy Landes:
What were you thinking about with that last smile?
 

Wood:
You know what they cut out though? It’s not there… [he then grins and gives us all two thumbs’ up.] They cut out the thumbs! 

[This gets laughter for a long time.]

[getting serious] That smile had to encompass a lot. It’s essentially supposed to be peace. Frodo finally has [found] the Frodo we remember from the Shire, shed of that loss of innocence that he had. The innocence has returned. It’s all of those things. That’s all I was thinking of, trying to be as pure and peaceful as possible.