l o o k i n g   c l o s e r

lclogo1.jpg (14001 bytes)

  <  back

respond to the review


Holes


a review by Jeffrey Overstreet

Copyright © 2003 by Jeffrey Overstreet.
Reproduction is forbidden without permission of the author.


Reviewing Holes for Christianity Today, Jeffrey spoke with director Andrew Davis about making the movie and about Louis Sachar's meaningful storytelling. Click here to read that review.

 

Director Andrew Davis, famous for directing The Fugitive, is back with Holes, another film about a wrongly accused man. But Stanley Yelnats is no Richard Kimble. This time, the accused is much younger. And he’s not nearly so lucky as to break out away from his captors during a train wreck early in the film. No, Stanley’s “luck” is terrible; he is continually persecuted and branded for crimes he didn’t commit, even while “imprisoned” at a hard labor camp for young crooks.

But this hero may be, in some ways, more admirable than Kimble. Stanley, perfectly portrayed by newcomer Shia LaBeouf, has that same glum “Why does everything happen to me?” expression often seen on the face of Friends’ David Schwimmer. Stanley is, in fact, almost a model teen. He’s kind-hearted, slow to anger, and he has a keen sense of right and wrong. He is even willing to accept the consequences of other peoples’ sins, and to make the best of his undeserved punishment, even penning optimistic letters home to the folks.

Perhaps this sounds very familiar. If so, you are probably one of the masses who have read and enjoyed the source material-- the National Book Award and Newberry Award-winning young readers’ novel by Louis Sachar. If you’ve read the book, you may have minor complaints with this movie, just as every book-lover tends to nitpick when it comes to big screen adaptations. (Count me in—I’m always chewing on the editorial changes Peter Jackson made to The Two Towers.)

But face it—movies are different animals than books, and it is difficult to make everything that works on the page translate to the screen. Davis and Sachar, who also wrote the screenplay, have done an admirable job, condensing the story while retaining its complexity, adjusting the timeline of events slightly for storytelling efficiency, and they have drawn in a perfect cast.

If you haven’t read the book, here’s the setup: Stanley, whose family life has a Willy Wonka quality to it, has grown up watching his family suffer under a famous family curse. Grandfather talks endlessly about the curse, which involves a family legend about a pig farmer and a spooky old witch (Eartha Kitt.) Stanley’s mother (Siobhan Fallon Hogan) grumbles and sighs while his father (Henry Winkler) tries and fails to fulfill his dream of inventing a cure for stinky shoes.

Now, it’s Stanley’s turn to suffer. Stanley has been caught stealing some famous shoes, or so the authorities think. His punishment is to serve 18 months at Camp Greenlake, a labor camp where he and other teens are forced to dig holes all day long. Their supervisor, a cruel pot-bellied gun-totin’ cowboy called Mr. Sir (an enthusiastically over-the-top Jon Voight), cracks the proverbial whip and tries to keep order with his system of “punishment and reward”, perpetually spitting sunflower seeds. Mr. Pendanski the camp counselor (Tim Blake Nelson) is softer; he gives the boys pep talks to keep them in line, fond of platitudes like “The early mole digs the deepest hole” and “It should be no labor to be nice to your neighbor.” But Pendanski has a mean streak as well, and he aimis it at the meekest member of the bunch—little Zero (the remarkable Khleo Thomas). These two tyrants swagger and shout until their own overseer arrives to check the progress (Sigourney Weaver in a role she clearly relished.) The Warden doesn’t just want these kids to learn lessons from their labor. She has a particular interest in taking inventory of anything they dig up. Thus… the mystery. What's under all that dirt?

It may sound simple so far. It’s not. The goal of the Warden’s digging, Stanley’s tendency towards misfortune, and the solemn glare of little Zero are all intricately linked, bound up in stories from their past. The mystery reaches back to the Old West, where a beautiful schoolteacher (Patricia Arquette) and a charming handyman (Dule Hill) found a romance that echoes the famous “As You Wish” saga of Westley and Buttercup.

Speaking of The Princess Bride, all of these stories are told so cinematically, with such effortless humor and youthful enthusiasm, I was reminded of the glory days of Rob Reiner. There’s a Stand by Me charm to this whole story, elevating it far beyond the typical Disney after-school-special fare. Davis reveals a talent for directing kids that far outshines Spielberg’s work with the Lost Boys of Hook.

It’s not a perfect film. His villains are a bit too cartoonish—Voight’s performance would have been more effective if there had been less of him onscreen. And the big finale feels like it has too many convenient tearjerking resolutions. But then again, I did not mind this too much. Holes is, after all, a fairy-tale at heart, full of wicked witches who inflict curses on well-meaning youngsters. Its hugs-all-around conclusion does not manipulate our emotions with tricks; every happy twist is well-earned and makes sense with all that has come before. The fact that so many moments of real drama and spiritual resonance can be found in such a commercial movie is quite a delightful surprise. In fact, I’ll happily call this the most satisfying, entertaining, and amusing movie released by a studio so far this year.

Walden Films can be proud of this, their first major release. This is truly a Big Screen film, with stylish cinematography that easily distinguishes between the non-chronological plot threads. The soundtrack is a little too anxious to send viewers to the music store to order copies, but the songs are carefully chosen; their heavy gospel content and style constantly nudges us to consider the spiritual implications of these numerous interconnected parables. Louis Sachar was not preoccupied with preaching any particular message; he insists he just wanted to tell a good story. But here’s the thing—when a story is told with excellence, it cannot help but echo the truths revealed by Scripture. I am therefore thrilled to point out that Walden Films is at the helm of the upcoming Chronicles of Narnia films.

What kept me wide-eyed and smiling…

besides LaBeouf’s humble, unglamorous, and generous lead performance …

besides the quiet authority of young Khleo Thomas as “Zero”…

besides the way Davis and Co. refused to “dumb down” the story for a young audience, and thus paid them tremendous respect almost un-heard of in contemporary family movies…

besides the funniest humor to be found in the past few years of family films…

…was the way the story repeatedly leads us to images, moments, and exchanges that have the simple and subtle power of great Bible stories. Holes constantly references classic movies without depending on those references to gain credibility; there are amusing nods to Lawrence of Arabia, Raiders of the Lost Ark, O Brother Where Art Thou?, The Shawshank Redemption, and above all Cool Hand Luke. But there are also quiet—perhaps inadvertent—echoes of Bible stories. We are reminded of Daniel in the Lions’ Den and the Three Dudes in the Fiery Furnace. Stanley’s honorable service during unjust imprisonment reminds me of the labors of Joseph—which I maintain is the #1 Most Eligible Epic still waiting for its big screen version. There is even a moment in which an act of heroism gives one of the characters some significant scars on his hands, and the symbol really works.

Holes never preaches. The author has fulfilled his aim—he has told a story very well, and Davis has succeeded in preserving its complexity and power. Young viewers and old alike will be given powerful metaphors of servanthood and selflessness, humility and honor, courage and Christ-like kindness. Children younger than 8 or 9 might find it too challenging; the film moves quickly and often shifts abruptly into flashback. There are also many characters characters to keep track of, but they are all memorable; the kids resemble the eclectic prison crowds of famous prison flicks, and Stanley’s family tree is full of strange fruit. Teens and grownups—the book’s intended audience—should find it strangely compelling, considering that the movie avoids crude humor, scantily clad women, fast cars, guns, and other things they shouldn’t be messing with.

There will be those religious press critics who condemn the film for the plot device of “the family curse.” They misunderstand the fairy-tale nature of the story. Scripture clearly forbids us from cursing others, but it does not forbid storytellers from talking about curses, which have clearly been employed (effectively or otherwise) by real people and fictional characters since the world began. (You’ve no doubt heard of Adam’s curse. Or the one Michael Jackson tried to put on Steven Spielberg.) The film does not recommend curses, but rather uses the curse as a reflection of the hardships and failures we all experience, the problems we all must overcome. And the breaking of the curse is not something done with violence or individual effort, but rather it comes as the result of kindness, grace, and opportunity that seems orchestrated by something… someone… higher. Thus, Holes culminates—I’ll try not to give anything away—with small miracles and a sense that everything is in God’s hands. Or at least on His Thumb.

Jeffrey's Rating: A-
Click here for an explanation of ratings.