l o o k i n g   c l o s e r

  <  back

respond to the review

American Beauty

a commentary by Jeffrey Overstreet

Copyright © 2002 by Jeffrey Overstreet. Reproduction is forbidden without permission of the author.
Contact Jeffrey Overstreet at joverstreet@gmail.com.
 

THIS COMMENTARY DISCUSSES PLOT POINTS.
IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO KNOW THE STORY, DO NOT READ THIS REVIEW.
If you want to read the spoiler-free "report card",  click here.


Another dysfunctional family

American cinema is preoccupied with the image of the American family that was sold to us in the 50s...that "Father Knows Best" model of the dutiful Dad, the perfect Mom, and the happy boys and girls.

In the 80s and 90s, David Lynch and his cinematic disciples brought to our attentions to the dishonesty of that representation. He practically shoved the ugly truth down our throats. With "Twin Peaks" on television and Blue Velvet in theatres, he showed us just how much evil can lurk behind the facade. The message seemed to be this: that 50s family fantasy is a lie, but when we understand that everything is corrupt, it's very difficult to grasp any hope, faith, or love.

This year's Oscar-winner for Best Picture introduces us to yet another dysfunctional family.

By Sam Mendes' American Beauty begins, the happy days are already over. Dad is cynical and depressed. Mom is burning herself out in her quest to be a professional success. And their daughter is lost, lonely, neglected, and she knows it. "I need a father that's a role model," complains Jane to her boyfriend Ricky.

She's right. Her father, Lester Burnham, is a bitter jerk, hardened by days at the office, embittered by a marriage gone sour, and lusting after high school girls. "Do you want me to kill him for you?" Ricky asks Jane. Is he joking?

And so begins American Beauty.

"Look closer," says the movie's slogan. Slowly, the movie takes us under the surface to the lies, the private sins, the fear and loathing. But even as it peels back the skin and shows us the cancer, it shows us possible responses to it. We can become angry. Or rebellious. Or cynical. Or all of the above.

Or, we can also look for the roses among the thorns, the beauty in the brokenness, and respond with beauty and grace of our own.

Sounds wonderful, right?

Unfortunately, in spite of good intentions, American Beauty tells a few lies of its own.

 

The awakening of Lester Burnham

We can understand the bitterness and cynicism of Lester Burnham (Kevin Spacey). His job sucks. His wife Carolyn (Annette Bening) doesn't pay attention to him. Their social life and their sex life are the pits.

So it makes sense to us that Lester would connect with the free-spirited boy next door. Ricky (Wes Bentley) is a rebel. He feels comfortable quitting his job, taking everything lightly, smoking a joint, and enjoying life. This philosophical drug-dealing teenager shows Lester how to be courageous and spontaneous. Lester is dumfounded. Can a person really live so recklessly, just do as they please, and get away with it? Is happiness that simple?

It is the turning point in Lester's life and, we are led to believe, the beginning of his journey towards happiness.

So, when he develops a crush on his daughter's best friend, a high-school cheerleader named Angela (Mena Suvari), he starts flirting with disaster. We are led to believe an inappropriate crush is what lights the spark in Lester's heart. Like Mr. Watanabe in Akira Kurosawa's Ikiru, he's drawn to the possibility of regaining his youthful sense of wonder, but he goes about it the wrong way... by trying to possess someone who is out of his reach.

Nevertheless, he gets back into shape. He develops a wild fantasy life. He starts enjoying himself. The fact that he's acting irresponsibly as a husband and a father fails to bother him.

Meanwhile, his wife Carolyn is behaving the same way. She's frustrated at being a professional failure. So she starts shooting pistols to let off steam, and she pursues an extramarital affair to cheer herself up. Her failure as a mother and a wife doesn't seem to bother her.

Yep, everybody in this story is carrying dark secrets that bring them some measure of happiness.

Clearly, disaster awaits.

Watching this film, I sensed that the conclusion could be a revelation. Like Ang Lee's The Ice Storm, we might see characters realize that there are rules, and that breaking them devastates our own lives and the world around us.

Unfortunately, that's not where American Beauty ends up. Whereas Ikiru's Mr. Watanabe discovers that joy comes through humility and service, the characters in this film come to different conclusions that lack such insight.

In the few times I have seen this movie, the audiences have left exhilarated, wide-eyed, deeply moved. Obviously, America was touched by this film.

But what have we learned from it? Let's take the challenge and look closer.
 

What does it mean?

In the story of Lester Burnham's hell-bent quest for happiness, the audience is set up to cheer for his smug rebellion and his recklessness. We laugh at his sarcasm. We cheer when he acts irresponsibly. We are amused at his lustful fantasies. We are not given enough opportunity to be disturbed at what he is doing to his family.

And then, in the final moments of the film, as Lester draws closer and closer to de-flowering Angela the teenage cheerleader, things become suddenly uncomfortable. The movie abruptly admits that, yes, there is a moral absolute here. There is a right and wrong. Lester does have a moral responsibility.

Yes, Lester does the right thing in backing away from his long-awaited tryst with little Angela. Yes, it is good to resist temptation.

But then Lester does something very very wrong. When Lester turns away from her, she feels humiliated. Shame overwhelms her. She feels terrible.

And Lester says, "You have nothing to be sorry for."

If he had said, "It will be okay" or, "Yes, we have behaved very badly, and let's never do it again," or if he had said "I'm sorry for my part in bringing us to this place..." that might have worked.

But American Beauty shows us characters learning to shrug their shoulders at their mistakes. In fact, it won't even admit that they're mistakes.

Lester assures Angela that she is valuable and special. That's good. She is. The movie has that part right. But Angela is not innocent. She has made a mistake and has a lesson to learn. Same goes for Lester.

We should grieve when we realize that we have acted irresponsibly. We should let our conscience be our guide. Even Jiminy Cricket knew that.

It gets worse. In the end, as his daughter Jane finally gets fed up with this family and runs away, as his wife is driven to thoughts of murder, Lester reaches a state of nirvana, smiling, sighing, "I'm fine. Everything's fine."

Wrong again, Lester. When you find out that you're sick, don't sigh and say everything's fine. Go get surgery... and then get on with your life. You're a husband and a father, Lester. Go out there and try to make things work with your wife. Confess your sins, ask for forgiveness, and then start over.

The most blatant example of this movie's dangerous optimism is still yet to come. When a central character lies dead, shot in the back of the head, young Ricky discovers the body. He approaches it slowly and smiles, as though moved by the beauty of it. The camera impresses upon us that yes, this is the lesson. Even in murder there is beauty.

Perhaps one can find beauty in such a spectacle. But when a person's initial reaction to the bloody murder of a good friend is to smile and sigh at its beauty... get that man to a psychiatrist! Grief and horror are a natural and entirely appropriate reaction to evil, just as we should all be thankful for pain, because it tells us there is something wrong.

Phillip Yancey writes about the problem of pain with great insight. He talks about how the disease of leprosy robs its victims of the gift of pain. Because lepers can't feel pain, they often don't realize when they are causing themselves injury, and they suffer irreversible damage. To me, the climax of American Beauty is encouraging us toward a sort of emotional leprosy. Ricky gives us no evidence of pain, grief, or horror at the death of his friend. He smiles, gets up, and runs away... a hero for inspiring others to acts of irresponsibility.
 

A double standard

Strangely, American Beauty gives Lester permission to do what he wants, to shrug at his mistakes, to go on smiling. But it doesn't extend that privilege to others.

Audiences cheer when Lester goes after his goals. But when Carolyn goes after her own selfishness and sleeps with another man, we are led to celebrate and laugh and cheer when she gets caught by Lester, who again gets to deliver the winning sarcasm.

Audiences hate Ricky's dad (Chris Cooper), the nasty ex-military conservative next door, when he himself is making the same mistakes as Lester... self-righteously pursuing control of his own world. (In movies of moral anarchy, the liberals always cry "tolerance, tolerance," while demonstrating intolerance for conservatives and making them out to be the enemy.)

Acclaimed film critic Pauline Kael asked in exasperation, "Can't liberals see that this movie sucks up to them at every turn?"
 

Pushing the audience's buttons

American Beauty has an ironclad strategy for pleasing American audiences. First, it appeals to our cynicism. Then it appeals to our self-interest. And finally it appeals to our sense of morality. If you say you don't like this movie, you're in all kinds of trouble. Like another Best Picture winner, it shows that all of life's problems can be fixed with a simple change of perspective. "Forrest Gump" implied that life's difficult conflicts can be solved with simple platitudes and and ignorance of life's complexities. You made enemies fast if you said you didn't like the movie. American Beauty implies that we can be happy if we just focus on the positive, beautiful things and ignore, or worse, deny, the disease. Evil, it suggests, comes from conservatives.

At least Forrest Gump had a heart for serving others, loving others, and was rather selfless. I give him credit for that. Lester Burnham is not an advocate for selflessness. He's a champion of ignoring the real problem. Sure, he makes one decision that shows he has some shred of decency. But the audience has been encouraged to celebrate, to laugh, to revel in all of his selfish maneuvers along the way. And so the audience goes home happy, having had a great time.

Okay, it has a muddled message. But is it art?

American Beauty does have its virtues.

Master cinematographer Conrad Hall makes this fairly typical American neighborhood very easy on the eyes.

The soundtrack is effectively restrained.

And there is an impressive, breakthrough performance by Wes Bentley.

But this movie is hardly original. From television's "Roseanne" to "Married With Children", America is doing its best to convince itself that there's nothing wrong with broken relationships. If these messed up families are fun to watch week after week, then we can feel better about our own problems. When David Lynch and Ang Lee deconstructed the typical American family, you could sense a genuine grief at the problems there, a longing for people to do the right thing, to be good fathers and mothers, to save their families. "American Beauty" uses the same devices to expose the evils, and then just smiles while it all goes to hell.

Director Sam Mendes seems worried that we won't get the film's message. The narration from the very beginning of the movie, and the big speeches of each character along the way, tell us what it all means so we're sure not to miss it.

I would offer briefly (without making this review any longer than it already is) seven points about its artistic flaws.

1. It compromises its own narrative structure. If Lester Burnham is telling the story, how does he know so much about what went on in the neighbor's houses behind closed doors?

2. Too much time spent sharing Lester's sexual fantasies. Okay... Lester has a crush on a high-school cheerleader! Enough already. We get it. Do we have to watch him fantasize about her, over and over? And in slow motion? This film will likely inspire more pedophiles than it discourages, assuring them that they have "nothing to be sorry for."

3. The performances. Many are calling Spacey's performance Oscar-worthy. He is good at playing the jaded rebel with a smart remark for everything that comes his way. But is this much of a "performance"? It's not that much different from the demeanor of his character in LA Confidential, and there's even a bit of his Usual Suspects turn in there as well (in his metamorphosis from a slouch on the couch to a confident athlete.)

Annette Bening as Lester's success-or-bust wife is certainly enthusiastic. But she swings a little bit too drastically between campy Lucille-Ball-funny and the I'm-Gonna-Get-Nominated melodrama.  

To show how evil Ricky's conservative ex-military father is, Ricky's poor mother, a silent, battered, and repressed woman, is played by Allison Janney like a zombie out of Night of the Living Dead.

Some of the performances are commendable, especially Bentley as Ricky. The always-impressive Peter Gallagher seems determined in each movie to come up with a more outrageous hairstyle than his last movie. But these performances belong in different films... a drama and a satire.

4. The profound speeches are jarringly inconsistent with the rest of the characters' dialogue. I couldn't imagine Spacey's speech at the end coming out of the mouth of his wisecracking Lester Burnham. See if you can. It sounds like a passage out of "Deep Thoughts" or a Hallmark card. 

5. Is it camp, or is it realism? Early scenes portray the Burnhams and their neighborhood with such exaggeration that one can imagine the neighborhood from Edward Scissorhands right around the corner. 45 minutes later (specifically, in the scene where Lester meets Ricky), the movie's tone changes. The characters suddenly become real. The neighborhood quits acting like a cartoon. And the mean-spirited satire backs off for a more contemplative tone.

6. Unnecessary nudity.. Hey, if the camera lingers on the nudity of under-aged girls for the sake of "realism", why does the camera avoid male nudity? And if the filmmakers want us to view Lester's lust for a minor as wrong, why does the camera ogle at this cheerleader's naked body, while the storytellers steer around any acknowledgment of the consequences of such pursuits?
 

Conclusion

American Beauty does have some important things on its mind. I would agree with some of its exhortations. Hang on to your youthful lust for life. Do this by seeking all that is beautiful, and by telling the truth in everything.

But I would add... do so carefully, and with love. If American Beauty had shown the importance of this, it might truly have been the year's best picture.

Just one year earlier, The Ice Storm accomplished what American Beauty did not. America didn't notice the best movie of 1998.

Jeffrey's Rating: C+